Jewish World Review March 27, 2003 / 23 Adar II 5763

Clarence Page

Clarence Page
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

A fog of war words: Shocking and awesome


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | NEW YORK CITY Along with death and destruction, every war brings us new euphemisms to make death sound less deadly.

The purpose of this doublespeak is to dumb us down and numb us down, making the other side's deeds sound more ugly and evil, while our side's actions are made to seem more pristine.

Past wars gave us "friendly fire," a sweet-sounding name for - "Oops!" -- blowing away someone who is on your own side. Sometimes this would happen in "free fire zones" during "search-and-destroy missions," an early Vietnam War term that later was sanitized to "search-and-clear." Different name, same operation.

The first Persian Gulf War popularized the term "collateral damage," a banal euphemism for the unintended killing of innocent bystanders. Many of us later were appalled, although we should not have been all that surprised, when Gulf War vet Timothy McVeigh used the term to describe the children who died at a day care center in the federal office building he blew up in Oklahoma City.

That's the problem with such weasel words of wartime. They make it too easy for some people to live in deep denial about the horrors that war inflicts, whether to our own troops or to somebody else.

This war has given us "Shock and Awe," which sounds like a video game or a hyperactive law firm. Actually, it is a not-very-catchy military term for an explosively sudden and bewildering assault by overwhelming force aimed at wearing down your enemy's will.

If our military leaders were perfectly candid about such matters, they would call "Shock and Awe" by what it sounds like: "something that will scare you witless if it doesn't kill you." As described in the 1996 book "Shock & Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance," by military strategists James Wade, Harlan Ullman and L.A. Edney, the atomic bombs that America dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were shocking and awesome, big time. But, they also ended World War II, saving many other lives, especially on our side, so they weren't all bad. Such are the judgment calls that one must make in real-world war.

Still, co-author Ullman recently told a reporter that the term was intended for use in the National War College and other military circles, not by the general public. "It's not entirely house-trained," he told the Washington Post.

Too late. Reporters heard the term and quickly embraced it, as if all warfare were not shocking and awesome.

But, rather than call a terror tactic what it really is, the Bush administration sends a mixed message. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tried to assure us on television last weekend that referring to "the bombing of Baghdad" was not accurate, since all of the bombing of Baghdad up to that point was quite precisely aimed at military targets. We scrupulously avoided the civilian areas of Baghdad whenever possible, he said.

Indeed, despite the shocking and awesome bombing, the city's lights could be seen on live TV still burning brightly amid the "Shock and Awe."

Nevertheless, a week earlier, Rumsfeld's department conspicuously tested its latest barrel of horrors, the Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or MOAB, a 21,000-pound bomb that's so big and dumb it has to be shoved out of the tail of a slow-moving transport plane.

With the explosive force of a small tactical nuclear weapon, minus the radiation, MOAB is nicknamed "the Mother of All Bombs." Call it what you will, it's anything but precise.

Among other interesting new euphemisms, we have "embedded journalists," which sounds like something that the top military brass would like to do to nosy reporters -- plant them in the ground.

Actually, it refers to journalists allowed to accompany fighting units into Iraq combat, as long as they do not wander off on their own. Reporters who wander around independently are called "unilaterals," often with condescension, the way drill sergeants speak of Gomer Pyles who just won't stick with the program.

Yes, "unilateral" is also what a lot of people call the United States for going to war without UN consent. The White House argues back that, no, we have a "coalition of the willing," which sounds to me like a few arms had to be twisted first.

Some skeptics here and abroad quickly labeled our coalition for killing a "coalition of the billing," for all of the billions the United States was offering to Turkey and others if only they would join in.

At least one British peace marcher carried a sign that denounced Bush's "coalition of the shilling."

Perhaps someday soon, the war will end and we can form a new coalition for the healing. Not shocking. Just awesome.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.



Comment on Clarence Page's column by clicking here.

Up

03/21/03: A Moranic moment bites peace movement
03/18/03: Viewers beware when tv networks don't care
03/14/03: Powell's battle for Bush's ear
03/10/03: 'Embedded,' but not 'in bed with'
02/28/03: Bridging the black gender gap
02/19/03 Braun vs. Sharpton: A Dem dilemma
02/14/03: Bush's clean-up man
02/11/03: How feds fooled marijuana trial jurors
02/06/03: Time to re-think space shuttle's value
01/31/03: Why corporations like diversity, too
01/28/03: Shaq vs. Yao, a new world diss-order
01/23/03: Affirmative action will be remarketed under new name
01/13/03: Bond movie offers clues to Korea crisis
01/07/03: Dr. Frist to the rescue … of his party
01/02/03: Feeling a 'draft,' but not much
12/17/02: To rob a burning cross of its power
12/03/02: Closing black-white test-score gaps
11/19/02: Uncle Same wants your data
11/15/02: Marriage vs. 'player' impulse
11/11/02: How Oz can help the Dems
11/05/02: We reserve right to be complicated
10/22/02: What the pro-gun lobby and anti-gun lobby have in common
10/18/02: Take Sharpton seriously? For Prez??
10/15/02: A beauty and the bullies
10/08/02: Time to start 'fingerprinting' bullets
10/08/02: Poet laureate hater fell for Internet hoax
10/04/02: Keeping it real, despite howls from black 'leaders'
10/01/02: Revisiting the 'Jogger' horror
09/27/02: Sometimes freedom is a necessary nuisance
09/13/02: Foil Fidel with free trade
09/10/02: Measuring the myth of 'super weed'
09/06/02: A year later: A reality-check
09/03/02: Make better choices before some jury somewhere does
08/20/02: Bid farewell to the Cigarette Century
08/16/02: Rights matter, even in circus trials
08/09/02: Jousting with Rumsfeld's fog of wit
08/06/02: Covert action is cool again
08/01/02: Powell's premature obituaries
07/30/02: A common sense tip on internal snooping
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks

© 2001 TMS