Jewish World Review April 21, 2003 / 19 Nisan 5763
Sitting on scoops at CNN
CNN's chief news executive, Eason Jordan, shocked and awed a lot of people when he confessed that his network suppressed stories of Iraqi brutality.
He also appears to have gratified a lot of fans of the Fox News Channel, CNN's biggest competitor.
I can tell by my e-mail and snail mail. I recently had the audacity to write unkind things about the tendency of Fox's anchors to embrace the language of the Bush White House, like "homicide bomber" instead of "suicide bomber" and "the war to liberate Iraq," instead of "an invasion" to topple the regime.
So it was with unmitigated glee that Fox fans sent me copies of Jordan's op-ed piece from the April 11 New York Times, along with messages along the lines of, "What do you have to say about this, wise guy?"
I say this: Journalists make judgment calls every day, especially when they work in places where government thugs routinely terrorize the populace. CNN made the wrong call in Baghdad, in my opinion. Repeatedly.
But, hey, if my choices were limited to one channel that sucks up to Hussein and another that sucks up to the White House, I'd ask for more choices.
Fortunately, we do have more choices and, as choices go, CNN appears to have made some very wrong ones.
Jordan acknowledged that he sat on some stories about truly horrendous atrocities by the Iraqi regime out of concern, he says, for Iraqis who were sources or who were working for the network.
Among other disclosures, Jordan revealed that Saddam's people beat and used electroshock torture on an Iraqi CNN cameraman in the mid-1990s for refusing to say that Jordan worked for the CIA.
An aide to Saddam's son Uday explained to Jordan that Saddam's henchmen had ripped out his front teeth with pliers and told him never to wear dentures, "so he would always remember the price to be paid for upsetting his boss." (Jordan did not reveal what the aide's offense might have been.)
None of these inside stories, among other scoops, was reported by CNN for fear that their sources would be executed, Jordan says. After a wide variety of critics accused him of sucking up to Saddam to keep his bureau open, Jordan pointed out that Iraq actually expelled the network a half-dozen times, precisely because the regime was unhappy with CNN's reporting. The most recent expulsion came at the beginning of the recent war.
Still, CNN was able to reopen its bureaus partly because Jordan made 13 trips to Baghdad over the last dozen years to lobby the Iraqi government to keep the bureaus open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders.
CNN could have refused to work under such tight government restrictions. Or its correspondents could have broadcast their stories with some sort of visible or spoken disclaimer such as, "This report is filed under the watchful eye of government censors."
Such a move might have gotten them kicked out, but their credibility would have stayed intact. CNN reporters could have roamed about more independently outside the country, talking to refugees and defectors and the Saddam regime would once again have exposed itself for the tyrannical swamp it truly was.
Instead, it appears that none of the scoops CNN reported out of Baghdad over the past decade was bigger than the ones they were sitting on.
We usually like to think there's a clear line between legitimate cooperation with government authorities and selling out to their propaganda machine. But, in the mad rush to be first with the best access to the hottest story, that line can become quite blurred in some people's minds, regardless of their political persuasion.
"After this huge admission by Eason Jordan.," Rush Limbaugh bellowed, "I don't know how anybody can look at CNN and watch what they report without asking, what are they not telling us?"
Note to Rush: That's OK, pal. A lot of people wonder what you're not telling us, too, but you've survived.
And so will CNN, I suspect. Jordan did the wrong thing. CNN probably will go out of its way now to show how well it can do the right thing. Its credibility as "the most trusted name" in cable news, to quote its ads, is at stake.
We can expect Fox's anchor stars, by contrast, to remain the bold cheerleaders for the establishment they've been in the past. As long as their ratings hold up, I expect them to be as "fair and balanced" as they always have been.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on Clarence Page's column by clicking here.
04/15/03: After Saddam? Watch out, Syria
04/11/03: 'Hammer time' for Castro
04/08/03: Post-Hussein: Winning the true peace
04/03/03: Right story, wrong TV station
04/01/03: Remembering Moynihan's mind
03/27/03: A fog of war words: Shocking and awesome
03/21/03: A Moranic moment bites peace movement
03/18/03: Viewers beware when tv networks don't care
03/14/03: Powell's battle for Bush's ear
03/10/03: 'Embedded,' but not 'in bed with'
02/28/03: Bridging the black gender gap
02/19/03 Braun vs. Sharpton: A Dem dilemma
02/14/03: Bush's clean-up man
02/11/03: How feds fooled marijuana trial jurors
02/06/03: Time to re-think space shuttle's value
01/31/03: Why corporations like diversity, too
01/28/03: Shaq vs. Yao, a new world diss-order
01/23/03: Affirmative action will be remarketed under new name
01/13/03: Bond movie offers clues to Korea crisis
01/07/03: Dr. Frist to the rescue … of his party
01/02/03: Feeling a 'draft,' but not much
12/17/02: To rob a burning cross of its power
12/03/02: Closing black-white test-score gaps
11/19/02: Uncle Same wants your data
11/15/02: Marriage vs. 'player' impulse
11/11/02: How Oz can help the Dems
11/05/02: We reserve right to be complicated
10/22/02: What the pro-gun lobby and anti-gun lobby have in common
10/18/02: Take Sharpton seriously? For Prez??
10/15/02: A beauty and the bullies
10/08/02: Time to start 'fingerprinting' bullets
10/08/02: Poet laureate hater fell for Internet hoax
10/04/02: Keeping it real, despite howls from black 'leaders'
10/01/02: Revisiting the 'Jogger' horror
09/27/02: Sometimes freedom is a necessary nuisance
09/13/02: Foil Fidel with free trade
09/10/02: Measuring the myth of 'super weed'
09/06/02: A year later: A reality-check
09/03/02: Make better choices before some jury somewhere does
08/20/02: Bid farewell to the Cigarette Century
08/16/02: Rights matter, even in circus trials
08/09/02: Jousting with Rumsfeld's fog of wit
08/06/02: Covert action is cool again
08/01/02: Powell's premature obituaries
07/30/02: A common sense tip on internal snooping
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks
© 2001 TMS