Jewish World Review May 22, 2003 / 20 Iyar 5763
Turns out race was a factor in the NYTimes scandal a very big one
We have a new breakfast suggestion in
the newsroom where I work: Cheez Doodles and booze.
We call it "the Jayson Blair diet."
Scotch, cigarettes and Cheez Doodles are now reported
by some of his former editors and colleagues at The
New York Times to have been the now-infamous
27-year-old reporter's preferred forms of self-medication
during his employment there. His brief career is now
stained by plagiarism, fabrications, numerous errors in
facts and outright lies about his locations and expenses,
particularly since last fall.
Many outside observers immediately accused Times
executives of "affirmative action run amok," saying they
had given Blair, who is black, extra breaks that one of his
white counterparts would not have received.
Key Times executives denied that race was a major
factor. Indeed, the record of white fakers and plagiarizers
in the news business far outnumbers that of blacks or other minorities.
Still, I concluded a column on the matter with this sentence: "It is important that the
Times dig a little deeper and tell us, if race is not the reason for the Blair snafu, what
Last week, New York Times editor Howell Raines faced his staff to answer questions
like that in an unprecedented meeting in a Broadway movie house. Raines later
e-mailed me a copy of his opening statement, although he was avoiding interviews.
As factors go, it turns out, Raines admits that race was a big one. Too big.
"Was [Jayson Blair] hired in the first place on a race-based preference?," he wrote.
"Our paper has a commitment to diversity and by all accounts he appeared to be a
promising young minority reporter. I believe in aggressively providing hiring and career
opportunities for minorities. To me, to consider the alternative is not acceptable to our
organization or to me as a person because it puts us in a position of perpetuating
historical inequity ...
"Does that mean I personally favored Jayson? Not consciously. But you have a right to
ask if I as a white man from Alabama with those convictions gave him one chance too
many by not stopping his appointment to the sniper team."
This was a reference to last fall's District of Columbia-area sniper case, to which Blair
was assigned as he was coming off of a probationary period sparked by verbal and
written reprimands for his high error rate. Freed from close supervision, he slid into
his bizarre binge of journalistic fraud.
"When I look into my heart for the truth of that," Raines continued, "the answer is yes. It
was a terrible mistake that harmed our paper, and I apologize for it."
And so we add to our menu the "Howell Raines Breakfast," coffee and crow.
I have long admired Raines, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who began his
newspaper career in Birmingham in 1964, a year after four little black girls were killed
there in an infamous church bombing. Civil rights has been one of his passions over
the years, along with his family and fly fishing.
But, smelling the coffee now, Howell surely knows that he didn't do Blair any favors by
easing standards in judging the young man's qualifications. Sure, corners often have
been cut over the years to benefit the preferred sons and daughters of the privileged.
But there is no good reason for the Times to risk its mighty name and resources on
one questionable Cheez Doodle-munching oddball, no matter what his color.
All of which raises a couple of other relevant questions: Is diversity worth the trouble?
And can we promote racial and ethnic diversity in our newsrooms without sacrificing
To the first question, the answer is yes. To better serve the communities it tries to
cover and to whom it tries to sell its product, the news business must try to build a
staff that reflects the same diversity of peoples and views.
Can we do it without sacrificing standards? Yes. More important, we must.
Some critics actually have complained that the American Society of Newspaper editors
has set a goal of achieving racial and ethnic parity with the general population in our
newsrooms by 2025. They should be comforted to know that a similar goal was set for
2000. When the industry failed to reach it, there was much disappointment expressed,
but no hard quotas were set.
Instead, newspapers are supposed to be doing what other businesses, workplaces
and universities should do: Look harder.
No applicant should be unfairly cut out because of race, but neither should any be
And once we are in the door, we journalists are minorities should not strive merely to
meet the same standards that everyone else does. We should strive to exceed them.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on Clarence Page's column by clicking here.
05/06/03: Closing the college graduation disparity
04/22/03: Fighting for privacy in an era of terror
04/22/03: Don't mis-underestimate the prez: Give him the 'props' he deserves
04/21/03: Sitting on scoops at CNN
04/15/03: After Saddam? Watch out, Syria
04/11/03: 'Hammer time' for Castro
04/08/03: Post-Hussein: Winning the true peace
04/03/03: Right story, wrong TV station
04/01/03: Remembering Moynihan's mind
03/27/03: A fog of war words: Shocking and awesome
03/21/03: A Moranic moment bites peace movement
03/18/03: Viewers beware when tv networks don't care
03/14/03: Powell's battle for Bush's ear
03/10/03: 'Embedded,' but not 'in bed with'
02/28/03: Bridging the black gender gap
02/19/03 Braun vs. Sharpton: A Dem dilemma
02/14/03: Bush's clean-up man
02/11/03: How feds fooled marijuana trial jurors
02/06/03: Time to re-think space shuttle's value
01/31/03: Why corporations like diversity, too
01/28/03: Shaq vs. Yao, a new world diss-order
01/23/03: Affirmative action will be remarketed under new name
01/13/03: Bond movie offers clues to Korea crisis
01/07/03: Dr. Frist to the rescue … of his party
01/02/03: Feeling a 'draft,' but not much
12/17/02: To rob a burning cross of its power
12/03/02: Closing black-white test-score gaps
11/19/02: Uncle Same wants your data
11/15/02: Marriage vs. 'player' impulse
11/11/02: How Oz can help the Dems
11/05/02: We reserve right to be complicated
10/22/02: What the pro-gun lobby and anti-gun lobby have in common
10/18/02: Take Sharpton seriously? For Prez??
10/15/02: A beauty and the bullies
10/08/02: Time to start 'fingerprinting' bullets
10/08/02: Poet laureate hater fell for Internet hoax
10/04/02: Keeping it real, despite howls from black 'leaders'
10/01/02: Revisiting the 'Jogger' horror
09/27/02: Sometimes freedom is a necessary nuisance
09/13/02: Foil Fidel with free trade
09/10/02: Measuring the myth of 'super weed'
09/06/02: A year later: A reality-check
09/03/02: Make better choices before some jury somewhere does
08/20/02: Bid farewell to the Cigarette Century
08/16/02: Rights matter, even in circus trials
08/09/02: Jousting with Rumsfeld's fog of wit
08/06/02: Covert action is cool again
08/01/02: Powell's premature obituaries
07/30/02: A common sense tip on internal snooping
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks
© 2001 TMS