Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 14, 2002 / 4 Tamuz, 5762

Dick Morris

Dick Morris
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Hey, journalists and Dems: Dubya is doing just fine | Journalists and Democrats (redundant though these two categories may be) seem to have convinced themselves that Americans are turning away from President Bush and that, in the words of Time magazine, support for the war on terror is "waning." Waning indeed? The latest Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll, taken on June 6, shows:

  • Bush's job approval at 74 percent;

  • Bush's ratings for the war on terror at 73 percent; and

  • Bush's efforts at homeland security win 67 percent approval.

Beyond personal approval of Bush, there is a broad support for his agenda. Rather than beset by qualms and worries over civil liberties, Americans welcome more aggressive action to empower investigative agencies to root out terror and protect our nation.

Voters approve of Attorney General John Ashcroft's measures to allow more intrusive FBI surveillance, including probes of Internet sites, by 66-22. They support racial profiling to subject Arab males to special screening in boarding airplanes by 54-34.

Asked whether they are more fearful of the FBI spying on them or doing too little to spy on suspected terrorists, voters are more concerned, by 71-13, about the latter than the former. By 63-24 they back expanding law enforcement powers to catch suspected terrorists, even if it requires sacrificing some personal civil liberties. And 64 percent say they would be willing to sacrifice some of their own personal liberties.

Nor are voters buying the efforts of Democrats and their journalistic allies to discredit Bush for doing too little to avert the attacks of Sept. 11th. Only 6 percent blame Bush for doing too little to prevent the attacks (13 percent blame the FBI, 12 percent blame Bill Clinton, 9 percent blame the CIA, and 4 percent blame Congress).

Not since the Republicans insisted on impeaching Clinton despite a public demand that the Monica Lewinsky scandal not be aired in public has a party's congressional delegation more misread the public mood. Voters worry that too little is being done, not too much, and are totally uninterested in assigning political blame for Sept. 11.

Rather, the fear of a new terrorist attack remains paramount in the minds of the average American. Seventeen percent said they believe there will be a terrorist nuclear attack on the United States, on our soil, within the next year, and 40 percent believe it will come within five years (50 percent say it will happen within a decade). One American in four reports personally fearing for his or her life as they contemplate the chances of future terrorism.

A fearful nation, determined to master its adversary, has no appetite for partisan recriminations.

Besides, each day that goes by without a new terrorist attack is another argument that the government is doing something fundamentally right in hamstringing terrorists throughout the globe.

The public support for administration measures to empower investigations even at the expense of civil liberties shows that the Vietnam era is over. Voters trust government again to use its judgment and discretion and not to abuse the license to investigate that they are giving it.

The Democratic Party is killing itself by attacking Bush in the war on terror. The more it is seen to be undermining the commander in chief while he battles to protect America, the more it slits its own throat and dims its prospects for the 2002 election.

And why are they taking risks like this? Every single domestic issue works for the Democrats and against the GOP. People side with the Democrats over the environment, campaign finance reform, Arctic oil drilling, global warming, Medicare reform, prescription drug benefits, Social Security reform and a host of other issues.

If the Democrats shut up they might succeed in keeping Bush's strong suit - the war on terror - out of the partisan dialogue. But if they continue to drag it in, it will be to their detriment in November.

Journalists who raise such questions are doing their jobs. It is fine for them to probe and criticize the record of this administration and the last one in protecting the nation from terror. But journalists don't have to get elected.

Democrats do.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Dick Morris is the author of, among others, "Power Plays: Top 20 Winning and Losing Strategies of History's Great Political Leaders" Comment by clicking here.


06/12/02: It's terrorism, stupid!
06/10/02: Sanctions are a potent weapon
06/04/02: Al Qaeda's more dangerous new front
05/31/02: Why '04 looks tough for liberal Dems
05/24/02: Democratic self-destruction
05/22/02: The Clinton failures
05/15/02: Pataki positioned to win
05/08/02: A wakeup-call for American Jewry
05/03/02: Give Bush back his focus
05/01/02: Immigration fault li(n)es
04/25/02: It's the war, stupid
04/17/02: Bush goes small bore
04/12/02: Bush must be a gentle partisan
04/10/02: In defense of polling
04/08/02: Focus on Iraq, not the Palestinians
04/01/02: Only Internet will bring real campaign finance reform
03/27/02: Where W's drawn a line in the sand
03/22/02: Enron scandal will not trigger a wave of economic populism
03/20/02: Term-limited --- by war
03/15/02: Europe doesn't have a clue
03/11/02: Bush popularity = GOP win?
03/01/02: Will America be forced to chase its tail in its war on terrorism?
02/27/02: The Arafat/Saddam equilibrium must be destroyed
02/21/02: Campaign finance reform won't hurt GOPers
02/13/02: Dodd scurries for cover
02/11/02: U.S. 'unilateralism'? The Europeans don't have a case
02/06/02: WAR: What women want
02/01/02: They all talk in the end
01/30/01: The odd couple: Chris Dodd and Arthur Andersen
01/22/01: His father's son? Bush better get an 'Act II' fast!
01/18/01: Dubya & the 'vision thing'
01/14/01: The Rumsfeld Doctrine 01/03/01: A President Gore would have been a disaster
01/03/02: Clinton's priority: Political correctness over fighting terror
12/27/01: Terror network grew out of Clinton's inaction, despite warnings
12/24/01: Call 'em back, George
12/18/01: What Bush did right
12/13/01: Libs worry too much
12/11/01: "Open Sesame": Feinstein's proposed bill allows 100,000 non-immigrant students from anti-American countries to our shores
12/07/01: The non-partisan president
12/05/01: Both parties are phony on stimulus debate
11/29/01: When terrorists can enter legally, it's time to change the laws
11/21/01: Go for the jugular!
11/16/01: You are all incumbents
11/14/01: Clinton's failure to mobilize America to confront foreign terror after the 1993 attack led directly to 9-11 disaster
11/12/01: To the generals: Don't worry about losing support
11/08/01: The death of the white liberal
11/07/01: Our leaders are being transformed in a way unprecedented in post-World War II history

© 2001, Dick Morris