Jewish World Review August 16, 2001 / 27 Menachem-Av, 5761

Clarence Page

Clarence Page
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Bush's u-turn on racial goals -- IN its first opportunity to take a stand on affirmative action, the Bush administration is taking a U-turn by deciding not to change directions. If that sounds a little wacky, just remember that we're talking about politics.

In a brief filed with the Supreme Court, the administration has decided to let the Clinton administration's position stand. It has asked the Supreme Court to uphold a Department of Transportation program the Clintonites defended to help minority contractors.

Before the filing, Bush spoke little about affirmative action. He did say during one of last year's presidential debates that he opposed "quotas," but favored "affirmative access." As an example of what that meant, he offered that government might appropriately "help meet a goal of ownership of small business, for example."

That's what the Transportation Department's "disadvantaged business enterprise" program, which aims to give 10 percent of all contracts to disadvantaged businesses, is designed to do. The case in question, now titled Adarand vs. Mineta, grew out of a challenge brought years ago by the white owned Adarand Constructors in Colorado Springs, Colo. Adarand had submitted the low bid for a Transportation Department contract, but it was awarded to a minority company as part of the department's "disadvantaged business enterprise" program.

Adarand sued and the Supreme Court ruled in 1995 that the program should be reviewed by lower courts using a new standard of "strict scrutiny" to see whether race was justified as a factor in awarding federal contracts. Last September the U. S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver said the program met the new test and the Bush administration now agrees.

As a result, Attorney General John Ashcroft, who promised in his confirmation hearings to defend even those laws with which he disagreed, will now get his chance. He and Solicitor General Theodore Olson, both highly vocal opponents of race-conscious programs, now find themselves leading the fight to defend such programs.

Why has Bush decided to pass up this opportunity to fight the programs the way the Reagan administration did?

One big reason may be Hispanic votes. They're "the hottest commodity in politics," as USA Today recently put it.

The same story also mentioned that, in seeking Hispanics for administration jobs, the Bush administration has set an informal recruitment goal of at least 10 percent. If so, Bush would not be the first politician to oppose racial, ethnic or gender "quotas" in public while setting racial, ethnic and gender "goals" or "timetables" for their own use.

That form of affirmative action is as old as political patronage. Throughout the last century, as new immigrant ethnic groups flowed mostly from Europe into American cities, politicians found ways to make sure the newcomers had "some of their own" represented in jobs, contracts and prominent ballot positions.

Unfortunately, racial discrimination kept most of these goodies out of black neighborhoods, even when black political bosses like Chicago's William "Big Bill" Dawson or New York's Adam Clayton Powell rose up. Dawson, for example, would rather have 1,000 low-paying jobs to hand out than 500 high-paying jobs, because the low-paid workers would be more politically loyal.

"Affirmative action" emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s with Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon, who colorfully said he wanted to give blacks "a piece of the action." Privately, he also wanted to drive a wedge between two bulwarks of the Democratic Party's coalition, minorities and organized labor. He achieved both goals.

For years, the Republican Party's national wing won white votes by portraying "quotas" as a threat to whites. But, as with earlier immigrant groups, Hispanic population growth across the country has made them an increasingly attractive bloc to be courted. By one widely reported estimate, if ethnics vote in 2004 in the same proportion that they voted in 2000, Hispanic growth would lead to a Bush loss by 3 million votes.

So it is not surprising that Bush, who won 35 percent of the Hispanic-American vote last November, is trying to have it both ways on affirmative action now. He has not been an advocate for it, but he hasn't attacked it, either. Even if the Supreme Court decides against his position on Adarand, Bush can say that at least he tried.

In the meantime, affirmative action, always under attack, survives another day. The Bush administration joins a long line of critics who found affirmative action to be troubling, yet, as a way to open opportunities to those who have been shut out, very hard to replace.

Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.


08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks

© 2001 TMS