Jewish World Review July 30, 2002 /21 Menachem-Av 5762
A common sense tip on internal snooping
Hearing Attorney Gen. John Ashcroft defend the government's new Operation TIPS program on Capitol Hill, I marvel at his ability to make an idea that might be quite useful sound quite sinister.
That thought occurs to me as Ashcroft sounds surprised at the bipartisan backlash that has greeted Operation TIPS (Terrorism Information and Prevention System).
Now being developed by the Justice Department in coordination with other agencies, TIPS will be one of five components of the Citizen Corps that President Bush announced in his State of the Union Address.
TIPS "will involve the millions of American workers who, in the daily course of their work, are in a unique position to see potentially unusual or suspicious activity in public places," the citizencorps.gov Web site explains.
All of which sounds to many of us a lot like an effort to enlist the nation's nosy neighbors into President Bush's "war on terror," which is how the president sometimes refers to his "war on terrorism." Maybe the war is being expanded to block any more "Halloween" movie sequels.
As word about TIPS has gotten around, the predictable alarm from the American Civil Liberties Union has been all but drowned out by similar distress expressed by conservative Republicans like Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia and Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah.
On July 18, House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas) added language to the House version of the Homeland Security Bill to prohibit the Justice Department from setting up Operation TIPS.
To help salvage the program in the Senate, Ashcroft assured senators last week that TIPS will serve only as a "clearinghouse" for information which will then be passed through to appropriate law enforcement agencies, each of which has well-established policies on the handling of information.
Details of the plan are still being worked out and that, dear reader, is part of the problem. I don't think TIPS would have aroused nearly as much suspicion had the administration let the public in on it sooner.
After all, this is a program that requires public cooperation in order to work. As such, a proposal that is this deeply intrusive into our daily lives should be openly discussed and debated, perhaps with town-hall meetings. Instead, the administration has shown an obsession for secrecy, which only arouses suspicion.
When I first heard about TIPS, I was reminded of Fidel Castro's Cuba, which I visited for the first time in June. One of the other American journalists with whom I was traveling remarked on our third day in Havana, "Have you noticed how this police state does not seem to have that many police?"
It was true. I usually see more cops in downtown Chicago or Washington. But that's the joy of an efficient police state, I added. They don't need a lot of police to spy on the people because the government puts people to work spying on each other.
In Cuba, local chapters of the Committee in Defense of the Revolution prevent crime the same way neighborhood-watch programs do in American neighborhoods. Criminals abhor a big audience. Police can't be everywhere, so the more eyes and ears they have in a community, the easier it is to spot unusual activity, including criminal activity, and put the culprits in jail.
But, of course, CDR watchdogs also report to higher authorities any activities of citizens, inside or outside of their own homes, that seem inconsistent with the principles of the revolution.
"You always know someone is listening," an independent Cuban journalist told me after his personal computers were confiscated.
CDR snooping is not the American way. Americans have known for years that we could cut crime considerably by imposing a police state, but we also have decided that the price was not worth it.
Is it worth it now? I doubt it, but that doesn't mean the federal government can't build a more efficient system for those of us who do spot something truly suspicious to report the information.
Instead of building an elaborate network of volunteer spies, the government should simply publish a toll-free phone number for all of us to use.
Like any other hotline, it would require careful screening to separate legitimate tips from the trash. But, unlike the more elaborate TIPS plan, a simple hotline would not be a radical departure from the sort of local crime-watch programs Americans already have.
That's my tip. I hope the government makes good use of it.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks
© 2001 TMS