Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Sept. 19, 2002 / 13 Tishrei, 5763

Dick Morris

Dick Morris
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Welfare reform: Keep on keeping on | The Welfare Reform Act passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1996 has proven itself to be the most succe ssful legislative enactment since the 1964 and 1965 civil rights laws and the Reagan tax cut of 1981.

Child poverty is at its lowest level in 20 years and the number of people on welfare has dropped from 13 million to 5.3 million, ending the generational cycle of welfare and dependency which had afflicted the black, Hispanic and poor white populations for decades.

Now, this progress faces a dual threat. From the left comes an effort to emasculate its core provision - the work requirement in order to receive welfare benefits - and from the right comes the possible response of eliminating any federal authorization for any welfare program at all when the current statue expires next month.

Congress must reject both threats and build on its historic success by extending the program of Temporary Assistance To Needy Families while not abandoning or watering down the reforms of 1996, which have made it work.

The liberals want to expand the definition of "work" to include education or training. It was just such an expansive definition of labor, which crippled the reforms in the welfare laws pioneered by then-Sen. Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.) in the 1980s.

Allowed to count any kind of training as work, states avoid biting the bullet and let welfare mothers dabble at job training forever without actually working for their checks. To go back to those days and water down the actual work requirement, which has so effectively raised incomes among the poor, is totally counterproductive.

Bill Clinton not only signed a law requiring work, he also pushed through a higher minimum wage and then declared that all work under the welfare law would be subject to the new, higher minimum wage levels. In addition, he and the Democratic Congress of 1993-94 also doubled the Earned Income Tax Credit, which rewarded those who worked at minimum wage with checks of $2,000 to $4,000 depending on the size of their families to move them out of poverty.

As Clinton was signing welfare reform, he blocked GOP efforts to scale back the tax credit, thus making sure that welfare recipients who worked would earn the equivalent of a lower-middle-class income in return.

But the keystone in this calculus was the work requirement. If that is replaced with a school or training requirement, it will represent an emasculation of the crucial provision which has allowed these women to escape poverty. The same purpose could be achieved by supplemental grants for those who earn degrees. But the work requirement must not be watered down.

The Democrats are also demanding an increase in the $5.2 billion of childcare funds approved by the House. In asking that the allocation rise to $5.9 billion, Senate Democrats are ignoring the basic fact that even though the number of welfare beneficiaries has been cut by almost 60 percent, states are still going to get $16.5 billion or welfare grants that they got when welfare rolls were at their peak. Surely this is enough in the basic program to cover extra childcare.

But the Republicans must not use Democratic intransigence as an excuse not to reauthorize the basic welfare program. The debate over childcare funding is not worth losing the entire program. If the Democrats give way on the work requirement, the Republicans should give in on the childcare issue.

Welfare reform is the best example we have of a creative collaboration between two parties. Marrying Democratic minimum wage, tax credit and day care programs with Republican work requirements and time limits has created a major success and Congress should not let it slip away as the session grinds to a close.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Dick Morris is the author of, among others, "Power Plays: Top 20 Winning and Losing Strategies of History's Great Political Leaders" Comment by clicking here.


09/12/02: Are Dems insane on Iraq?
09/09/02: Twin shadows of Election '02
09/05/02: GOP should triangulate
08/28/02: Trust the military
08/22/02: It's not the economy, stupid
08/09/02: As America unites, Gore goes divisive
08/01/02: Bush must focus on big picture
07/23/02: Election 2002: Advantage Dems
07/19/02: Rudy for SEC tough cop
07/17/02: The investor strike
07/15/02: Door open for drug testing students --- go for it, GOP!
07/12/02: Dubya looking out for No. 1?
07/03/02: The DNA war for Bush's soul
06/21/02: Why are conservatives winning?
06/19/02: Learning to love the feds
06/14/02: Hey, journalists and Dems: Dubya is doing just fine
06/12/02: It's terrorism, stupid!
06/10/02: Sanctions are a potent weapon
06/04/02: Al Qaeda's more dangerous new front
05/31/02: Why '04 looks tough for liberal Dems
05/24/02: Democratic self-destruction
05/22/02: The Clinton failures
05/15/02: Pataki positioned to win
05/08/02: A wakeup-call for American Jewry
05/03/02: Give Bush back his focus
05/01/02: Immigration fault li(n)es
04/25/02: It's the war, stupid
04/17/02: Bush goes small bore
04/12/02: Bush must be a gentle partisan
04/10/02: In defense of polling
04/08/02: Focus on Iraq, not the Palestinians
04/01/02: Only Internet will bring real campaign finance reform
03/27/02: Where W's drawn a line in the sand
03/22/02: Enron scandal will not trigger a wave of economic populism
03/20/02: Term-limited --- by war
03/15/02: Europe doesn't have a clue
03/11/02: Bush popularity = GOP win?
03/01/02: Will America be forced to chase its tail in its war on terrorism?
02/27/02: The Arafat/Saddam equilibrium must be destroyed
02/21/02: Campaign finance reform won't hurt GOPers
02/13/02: Dodd scurries for cover
02/11/02: U.S. 'unilateralism'? The Europeans don't have a case
02/06/02: WAR: What women want
02/01/02: They all talk in the end
01/30/01: The odd couple: Chris Dodd and Arthur Andersen
01/22/01: His father's son? Bush better get an 'Act II' fast!
01/18/01: Dubya & the 'vision thing'
01/14/01: The Rumsfeld Doctrine 01/03/01: A President Gore would have been a disaster
01/03/02: Clinton's priority: Political correctness over fighting terror
12/27/01: Terror network grew out of Clinton's inaction, despite warnings
12/24/01: Call 'em back, George
12/18/01: What Bush did right
12/13/01: Libs worry too much
12/11/01: "Open Sesame": Feinstein's proposed bill allows 100,000 non-immigrant students from anti-American countries to our shores
12/07/01: The non-partisan president
12/05/01: Both parties are phony on stimulus debate
11/29/01: When terrorists can enter legally, it's time to change the laws
11/21/01: Go for the jugular!
11/16/01: You are all incumbents
11/14/01: Clinton's failure to mobilize America to confront foreign terror after the 1993 attack led directly to 9-11 disaster
11/12/01: To the generals: Don't worry about losing support
11/08/01: The death of the white liberal
11/07/01: Our leaders are being transformed in a way unprecedented in post-World War II history

© 2001, Dick Morris