Jewish World Review Sept. 27, 2002 / 21 Tishrei 5763
Sometimes freedom is a necessary nuisance
NASHVILLE Want to have a little lively fun at a party? Ask people if they can name all five of the "freedoms" in the First Amendment.
If you cannot quite do it, you're not alone. In the latest of their annual polls on our freedoms conducted by the First Amendment Center and the American Journalism Review, only 2 percent of Americans could name all five.
What I find more disturbing is that no more than 58 percent could name even one!
That was the percentage that named "freedom of speech."
After that, the responses dropped way off. "Freedom of religion" was mentioned by 18 percent. Then came freedom of the press (14 percent), "right of assembly" (10 percent) and the one that almost everyone forgot (including me) the right to petition the government (2 percent.)
For a parlor game, such responses are amusing and revealing and, sometimes frightening.
For example, the Nashville-based First Amendment Center's poll found that nearly half of Americans think that our constitutional freedoms of speech and press, among others, go too far.
About 49 percent of those surveyed said they think the First Amendment gives us too much freedom, up from 39 percent last year and 22 percent in the year 2000.
More than 40 percent said newspapers should not be allowed to freely criticize the U. S. military's strategy and performance.
About half said the news media have been too aggressive in asking government officials for information about the war on terrorism.
More than 40 percent said they would limit the academic freedom of professors and bar criticism of government military policy.
About half said government should be able to monitor religious groups in the interest of national security, even if it means infringing upon religious freedom.
More than four in 10 said the government should have greater power to monitor the activities of Muslims living in the United States than it does other religious groups.
What this poll tells me is that a lot of Americans are afraid. Very afraid.
"Fear can short-circuit freedom," writes Ken Paulson, executive director of the Nashville-based First Amendment Center. "From Abraham Lincoln's suspension of civil liberties during the Civil War to the internment of Japanese-Americans in World War II to the McCarthyism of the 1950s, our nation sometimes has lost sight of its commitment to freedom. Fear does that."
People don't want to be troubled by too many questions when they are scared. I have received quite few letters and e-mails from readers who quote the old World War II line, "Loose lips sink ships," as if it were gospel to justify self-censorship and the excessive government secrecy sometimes practiced by the Bush administration.
Sorry, folks, but democracy doesn't work that way. Benjamin Franklin tried to tell that to the Pennsylvania governor in 1755, when he wrote, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Indeed. We all have a responsibility to keep our leaders accountable or we all share the blame when our leaders mess up.
Some people apparently do not wish to be troubled by too many facts. They would rather live with the questions. It is no wonder, then, that the news-and-opinion media are so unpopular in polls. It is a big part of our job as news and opinion writers to provoke people, to try to get answers or try to encourage our audiences to think.
After all, what good is the First Amendment if we Americans don't use it?
Some people sound troubled to see reporters questioning government officials about sensitive matters. I have a different feeling. I am reassured by it. To face reporters' questions shows me that our leaders are trying, at least, to look and sound accountable. There are no stupid questions, in my view, only stupid answers.
Nevertheless, I am optimistic that when Americans think these issues through, they come out for more freedoms, not less.
About 40 percent of the 1,000 adults who were surveyed said they have too little access to information about the government's war on terrorism, while only 16 percent believe there is too much.
And, when asked how important they thought each right to be, 68 percent gave the right "to be informed by a free press" the top rating of "essential," which is what an even larger 75 percent called the freedom of speech.
That sounds about right. First Amendment freedoms sound like a nuisance sometimes but they are a nuisance that we Americans really don't want to do without.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.
09/13/02: Foil Fidel with free trade
09/10/02: Measuring the myth of 'super weed'
09/06/02: A year later: A reality-check
09/03/02: Make better choices before some jury somewhere does
08/20/02: Bid farewell to the Cigarette Century
08/16/02: Rights matter, even in circus trials
08/09/02: Jousting with Rumsfeld's fog of wit
08/06/02: Covert action is cool again
08/01/02: Powell's premature obituaries
07/30/02: A common sense tip on internal snooping
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks
© 2001 TMS