Jewish World Review Oct. 11, 2002 / 5 Mar-Cheshvan 5763
Time to start 'fingerprinting' bullets
WASHINGTON While President Bush was addressing the nation from Cincinnati about the potential threat Saddam Hussein poses for our nation, folks in and around the nation's capital were grappling with a very real and present terrorist close to home.
They call him "the Sniper."
I am presuming that the Sniper is a "he" because of the knowledge we already have gathered from the similar sickos who came before him. Sure, women kill sometimes, but seldom in such an impersonal way. Serial sniping is, for the most part, a guy thing.
As the president spoke, the Sniper had killed six and injured two other Washington-area victims. One of the critically injured was a 13-year-old boy who had just been dropped off at school by his aunt.
In the Sniper's wake, street life in the nation's capital has turned unusually quiet. Hardly any joggers, bicyclists or kids appear on the streets. Area Starbucks coffeehouses closed their outdoor seating until further notice.
We've got terror right here at home, Mr. President, stirred up by a lunatic with an old-fashioned weapon of mass destruction, a gun.
Which brings me to an urgent question: If we respect the constitutional right of people to bear arms until they use those arms to commit crimes, why do we not use all of our available tools to trace bullets and guns used in those crimes?
Federal agents now have the technology to read the markings on bullets or shell casings and store them in a database that can be retrieved by police department computers across the nation. The three-year-old system is called the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network.
But the gun industry, the National Rifle Association and their friends in Congress have blocked the next logical step, "ballistic fingerprinting."
It would mean the test-firing of every gun before it is sold and the keeping of an electronic record of the markings that the weapons leave on the bullets or shell casings. That data could then be kept with the serial numbers of the guns, so that guns used in the commission of a crime could be traced.
But only Maryland and New York have such a ballistic "fingerprinting" system. Efforts to implement a national system have been blocked by the gun lobby, which views it as tantamount to gun registration -- which they view as tantamount to gun confiscation.
Meanwhile, the Sniper is at large. The gun lobby, once again, is feeling the heat and, as usual, they are fighting back.
Some gun-control opponents actually are using the Sniper to call Maryland's "fingerprinting" system a waste of money, since the Sniper began his reign of terror in that state. But, the Sniper really shows how state gun control laws, which can be skirted by crossing state lines, are a lot less effective than national laws.
Opponents of ballistic fingerprinting also argue that criminals can fool the system by making alterations like changing their gun barrel or firing pin. "Gun experts know this," Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, recently wrote in USA Today. "Ballistic-fingerprint proponents are not gun experts."
But, neither are a lot of crooks. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms' fingerprinting network already is leading to convictions by linking firearms to separate crimes.
But the ATF's network is limited only to guns recovered at crime scenes, not new purchases. Americans need to take the next rational step: Use available technology to link bullets back to the criminals who fired them.
Unfortunately, we have not been able to look to the Bush administration for much sensible reform in this area. Last winter, you may recall, Attorney General John Ashcroft's Justice Department stopped FBI agents from using federal gun purchase records to determine whether terrorism detainees after Sept. 11 had purchased guns. It would violate the privacy of gun buyers, Ashcroft had assured the National Rifle Association, even though Ashcroft was not showing much concern for other rights of detainees.
"You're either with us or you're with the terrorists," President Bush has said.
Right. And in the gun debate you can be with both.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.
10/08/02: Poet laureate hater fell for Internet hoax
10/04/02: Keeping it real, despite howls from black 'leaders'
10/01/02: Revisiting the 'Jogger' horror
09/27/02: Sometimes freedom is a necessary nuisance
09/13/02: Foil Fidel with free trade
09/10/02: Measuring the myth of 'super weed'
09/06/02: A year later: A reality-check
09/03/02: Make better choices before some jury somewhere does
08/20/02: Bid farewell to the Cigarette Century
08/16/02: Rights matter, even in circus trials
08/09/02: Jousting with Rumsfeld's fog of wit
08/06/02: Covert action is cool again
08/01/02: Powell's premature obituaries
07/30/02: A common sense tip on internal snooping
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks
© 2001 TMS