Jewish World Review Dec. 3, 2002 / 28 Kislev 5763

Clarence Page

Clarence Page
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Closing black-white test-score gaps | Studies about the state of education in America remind me of high school. That's a major reason why I hate reading studies about education in America.

Nevertheless one intriguing new study has caught my attention and won't let go. It tries to explain the gaping test score gaps between black, white, Asian and Latino students.

The puzzle is, why do white and Asian students tend to cluster on the high side of the gap and blacks and Latinos on the low side?

For years conventional wisdom has blamed the gap on poorly performing inner-city schools. But, not that schools are required to report their district test scores by race under federal education reforms, we see the racial test score gap repeating itself in prestigious suburban schools, too.

Is there something significantly different about the motivational makeup of children from different racial and cultural backgrounds?

Signithia Fordham, now an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Rochester, advanced a much-discussed and argued "oppositional culture" theory in the 1980s that spotlighted black high school students who ridiculed academic success as "acting white."

Many pundits, especially black ones like me, viewed that with alarm. After all, I said, black people don't have to worry about white racists when we show such eagerness to do their work for them.

All of which brings me to the new nationwide study tested that caught my eye. Conducted by the Minority Students Achievement Network, based on Evanston, Ill., it found very little difference between the races in students' desire to excel in school.

However, black and Hispanic students also reported that they did not understand their work as often as white and Asian students did and they were less likely to have computers at home or other resources that bolster student achievement.

The study surveyed 40,000 middle and high school students in the network's 15 member middle-to-high-income school districts across the country. Larger districts include Evanston and Oak Park, Ill.; Shaker Heights, Ohio; Ann Arbor, Mich.; Amherst, Mass.; Montclair, N. J.; White Plains, N.Y., and Berkeley, Calif.

Almost half of the black and Hispanic students said they failed to understand their teacher's lessons most of the time, compared to 27 percent of whites and 32 percent of Asians.

And, despite the overall affluence of their districts, black and Hispanic students were more likely to live with one or neither parent and their parents were less likely to have college degrees.

They also reported fewer educational resources at home. Only 20 percent of Hispanics and 27 percent of blacks said they had a computer at home, for example, compared to 57 percent of whites and 42 percent of Asian students.

Black and Hispanic students actually were more likely than white or Asian students to report that their friends think it is "very important" to study hard and get good grades. (Researchers asked about "friends" in order to avoid the pressure that students might feel to sound more pro-academics than they really were.)

But, alas, persuading them to do that hard study appears to be another matter. Asian students, for example, who scored higher than whites overall, also reported spending a half-hour to 45 minutes more time on their homework.

(SPECIAL ALERT TO MY TEEN-AGE SON: Please take note of that last statistic!)

Ronald F. Ferguson, a lecturer in public policy at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, who analyzed the research data, surmised that "acting white" might not be a criticism of academic achievement. Intead, he said, it may be a criticism of the "air of superiority" or distancing from one's racial group that some little geniuses take on.

He has a point. My dearly departed Uncle James, whose sons included a couple of terrific football players, used to pull my coat about lording my honor-roll grades over my lesser-achieving friends. "Don't just be proud of yourself," he admonished me. "Help some of these other boys to get ahead, too."

With that in mind, I appreciate the "reading buddy" programs some schools have in which high-achievers tutor younger and lower achievers.

I also applaud the teachers and administrators who are willing to take the time to make every child feel that they can learn.

Looking back on my own high school years with older eyes, I think kids really do want to feel proud of their schools' high achievers, just as they want to be proud of their schools. But more than anything, behind their cocky teen-age manner, they want to feel proud of themselves. Sports can do it for a while. Education can do it for a lifetime.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Comment on JWR contributor Clarence Page's column by clicking here.


11/19/02: Uncle Same wants your data
11/15/02: Marriage vs. 'player' impulse
11/11/02: How Oz can help the Dems
11/05/02: We reserve right to be complicated
10/22/02: What the pro-gun lobby and anti-gun lobby have in common
10/18/02: Take Sharpton seriously? For Prez??
10/15/02: A beauty and the bullies
10/08/02: Time to start 'fingerprinting' bullets
10/08/02: Poet laureate hater fell for Internet hoax
10/04/02: Keeping it real, despite howls from black 'leaders'
10/01/02: Revisiting the 'Jogger' horror
09/27/02: Sometimes freedom is a necessary nuisance
09/13/02: Foil Fidel with free trade
09/10/02: Measuring the myth of 'super weed'
09/06/02: A year later: A reality-check
09/03/02: Make better choices before some jury somewhere does
08/20/02: Bid farewell to the Cigarette Century
08/16/02: Rights matter, even in circus trials
08/09/02: Jousting with Rumsfeld's fog of wit
08/06/02: Covert action is cool again
08/01/02: Powell's premature obituaries
07/30/02: A common sense tip on internal snooping
07/18/02: Jacko plays race card badly
07/12/02: Last flight for a pioneer airman
07/08/02: Dems will miss Watts, too
06/28/02: 'Supreme Court reads polls, too
06/25/02: 'The Body' bites, then bows out
06/21/02: Punishment first, then the crime?
06/18/02: Reporting still risky for Haiti's press
06/14/02: Bush's security plan leaves large gaps
06/04/02: Fix FBI's culture gap first
05/28/02: Fidel's new apartheid for tourists
05/21/02: Now McKinney's lunacy sounds like the Democratic Party line
05/19/02: A paradox of historical proportions
05/14/02: 'Murphy Brown' revisited in age of Ozzy
05/10/02: America looks like a model of tolerance and inclusion
05/07/02: Forget it, Bill, you're no Oprah
04/26/02: Mapping out ethnic and racial change
04/23/02: A game of another color
04/19/02: It's high time to open up pot-law debate
04/11/02: 'Osbourne' family values rock, aging Ozzy quakes
03/22/02: Zimbabwe election leaves world sleepless
03/19/02: A slur? Where is thy sting?
03/15/02: A Pearl of wisdom for reporter's unborn son
03/12/02: Army race and gender policies on trial
03/08/02: A short list of losers to be left behind
03/05/02: Revenge of the 'mediasaurus'
02/26/02: Jihads aren't just for Muslims
02/26/02: It's hard to be 'objective' during wartime
02/19/02: Hollywood's new villain: Your HMO
02/12/02: Father of 'Manchild' leaves lasting message
02/08/02: $nookering the reparations crowd
01/31/02: Prisoners of a War of Words
01/29/02: One more Enron woe: Al Sharpton & company
01/25/02: Searching for slaves in bin Laden's attic
01/22/02: Andrew Young's newest 'friend'
01/08/02: Hard-earned lessons from 9-11
12/18/01: Whatever happened to questions about the birds and the bees?
12/14/01: The "White Negro" Taliban?
12/07/01: Jackson's turn to gloat
11/27/01: Friendly warning from a lover of liberty
11/21/01: The face of hunger is changing
11/15/01: Our troubled sense of trust
11/08/01: Lessons about terror from the 'hood
11/06/01: Getting used to the 'new normal'
11/02/01: Wicked ways to make them talk
10/30/01: It's not just about bin Laden
10/26/01: More than mail fell between the cracks
10/23/01: Terrorists threaten urban recovery, too
10/18/01: Sometimes, assassination warranted
10/15/01: Self-censorship rises again
10/12/01: Contradictions illustrate the complicated nature of the new terrorism
10/05/01: Look who's 'profiling' now
10/01/01: Don't trash liberty to save it
09/28/01: Life, love and cell phones during wartime
09/24/01: How to catch an elusive terrorist
09/21/01: The war I was waiting for
09/17/01: When rage turns to hate
09/13/01: Terror attack tests US, let's give right response
09/06/01: U.S. should have stayed and argued
09/04/01: Columbine killer's parents get upclose and personal
08/31/01: Virtual kids? Log me out
08/28/01: Two Africans, one black, one white, same fight
08/23/01: Sharpton for president
08/20/01: Shaking up the rules on keeping secrets
08/16/01: Bush's u-turn on racial goals
08/09/01: Outsider Bubba comes 'in' again
08/06/01: Not ready for 'color-blindness' yet
08/02/01: Immigration timing couldn't be better
07/26/01: Summer of Chandra: An international traveler's perspective
07/17/01: Overthrowing a régime is only the beginning
07/10/01: Big Brother is watching you, fining you
07/05/01: Can blacks be patriotic? Should they be?
06/19/01: Get 'real' about marriage
06/12/01: Amos, Andy and Tony Soprano
06/07/01: Getting tough with the Bush Twins
06/05/01: Bringing marriage back into fashion
05/31/01: "Ken" and "Johnnie": The odd-couple legal team
05/24/01: Sharpton's challenge to Jackson
05/22/01: Test scores equal (a) MERIT? (b) MENACE? (c) ALL OF ABOVE?
05/17/01: Anti-pot politics squeeze the ill
05/15/01: Was Babe Ruth black?
05/10/01: U.N.'s torture caucus slaps Uncle Sam
05/08/01: 'The Sopranos' a reflection of our times
05/03/01: 'Free-fire' zones, then and now
05/01/01: War on drugs misfires against students
04/26/01: Another athlete gets foot-in-mouth disease
04/23/01: 'Slave' boat mystery reveals real tragedy
04/19/01: McVeigh's execution show
04/12/01: Not this time, Jesse
04/05/01: Dubya is DEFINITELY his own man, you fools!
04/02/01: Milking MLK
03/29/01: The candidate who censored himself?
03/22/01: "Will Hispanics elbow blacks out of the way as the nation's most prominent minority group?"
03/19/01: Blacks and the SATs
03/15/01: The census: How much race still matters in the everyday life of America
03/12/01: Jesse is a victim!
03/08/01: Saving kids from becoming killers
03/01/01: Parents owe "Puffy" and Eminem our thanks

© 2001 TMS